Stratéjic Relationships Logo
The Ex-Employee List (EEL)Case Studies5 Core Areas of ExpertiseContact Us

Back

Price-Fixing Antitrust Litigation - Holding Companies Accountable

Price-Fixing Antitrust Litigation - Holding Companies Accountable
Price-Fixing Antitrust Litigation

August 22, 2024

Price-fixing is one of the most damaging antitrust violations, as it directly harms consumers by artificially inflating prices. Price-fixing antitrust litigation seeks to hold companies accountable for colluding to set prices, thereby undermining competition and violating antitrust laws.

Price-fixing occurs when competing companies conspire to set prices at a certain level, rather than allowing the free market to determine prices through supply and demand. This illegal practice results in higher costs for consumers and businesses, who are forced to pay more for goods or services than they would in a competitive market.

Price-fixing can take various forms, including horizontal price-fixing, where competitors agree to set the same prices, and vertical price-fixing, where manufacturers and retailers agree on minimum or maximum prices. Both types of price-fixing are illegal under antitrust laws.

Antitrust laws, such as the Sherman Act, are designed to promote competition and prevent anticompetitive practices like price-fixing. These laws allow individuals and businesses harmed by price-fixing to file lawsuits and seek compensation for the financial impact of inflated prices.

Price-fixing cases can be challenging to prove, as they often involve secret agreements between competitors. However, plaintiffs can use evidence such as communications between companies, pricing patterns, and expert testimony to demonstrate that price-fixing occurred and harmed consumers.

"Stratejic has represented a significant return on my investment. Paul and his team saved me a considerable amount of time filing a class action by providing me with the names and addresses of some former, harmed employees of my Defendant." - Douglas B. Lipsky, ESQ.

Stratejic Relationships, founded by Paul Littrell, Jr., assists price-fixing antitrust litigation by helping attorneys identify key witnesses and potential plaintiffs affected by the defendant’s actions. With 18 years of experience in uncovering corporate wrongdoing, Paul’s firm provides attorneys with the resources they need to build strong cases and pursue justice for consumers.

Victims of price-fixing may be entitled to compensation for the financial harm they suffered, including overcharges and lost profits. In some cases, plaintiffs may also seek treble damages, which allow them to recover three times the amount of their actual losses as a way to punish the defendant for their unlawful conduct.

Price-fixing antitrust litigation is essential in holding companies accountable for colluding to inflate prices and harm consumers. By working with experienced attorneys and leveraging the resources provided by Stratejic Relationships, plaintiffs can pursue justice and recover compensation for the financial harm they have endured.

Stay informed with us

Sign up to receive insights from Stratejic Relationships and learn more about new case studies, articles, and more.

What our clients are saying
Penn Law LLC

Paul is a fact witness magnet on his way to becoming a magnate in the niche he's expertly crafted. Not only do he and his team execute a proven method of bringing influential witnesses to bear in complex litigation, helpful fact witnesses just naturally gravitate toward them. People skills incorporated within the Witness|Mining™ process provide a seamless and time-saving transition which helps me develop relationships with fact witnesses with the potential to positively impact cases.

Darren W. Penn, ESQ.
Darren W. Penn, ESQ.

Penn Law LLC

Working with Stratejic Relationships recently has been a very positive experience. Consummate professionals, Paul and his team breathed new life into the investigation of a 10 year old personal injury case by identifying a substantial number of potential fact witnesses who may impact my ability to prevail against a corporate Defendant. They were insightful, prompt, and worked within my budget. Stratejic exceeded my expectations and is an organization with whom I continue to work.

Robert N. Edwards, ESQ.
Robert N. Edwards, ESQ.

The Law Office of Robert N. Edwards

New, Taylor & Associates

Conferring with the Whistleblower provided to me by Stratejic just prior to an important series of depositions provided me with invaluable insights into how my Defendant secretly conducted their business. Twenty minutes into my questions, and the first deponent had shredded the Defense, facilitating settlement. This is a service I will continue to use.

Stephen P. New, ESQ.
Stephen P. New, ESQ.

New, Taylor & Associates

Lipsky Lowe LLP

Stratejic has represented a significant return on my investment. Paul and his team saved me a considerable amount of time filing a class action by providing me with the names and addresses of a number of former, harmed employees of my Defendant. When you need a Class Representative, this is a time-efficient, economical, and ethical path to signing one, and a service I will continue to use.

Douglas B. Lipsky, ESQ.
Douglas B. Lipsky, ESQ.

Lipsky Lowe LLP

Beasley Allen Law Firm

Paul and his team have demonstrated a real proficiency for identifying and acquiring Insider Fact Witnesses who have the potential for bolstering claims, and in my own practice their unique solutions have represented a positive return on my investment.

Michael J. Crow, ESQ.
Michael J. Crow, ESQ.

Beasley Allen Law Firm

Richardson Thomas

Paul is an absolute lightning rod when it comes to investigations which produce fact witnesses who possess relevant information about, and interest in, my firm’s cases. His breadth of associations throughout the country is quite impressive, and he has the uncanny ability to help us forge impactful and beneficial relationships.

Terry E. Richardson, Jr., ESQ.
Terry E. Richardson, Jr., ESQ.

Richardson Thomas

Bailey Glasser, LLP

Paul and his team delivered exactly what they said they would: a list of impacted fact witnesses and their addresses relevant to our case within a given state, and they did so within our budget.

John W. Barrett, ESQ.
John W. Barrett, ESQ.

Bailey Glasser, LLP