Stratéjic Relationships Logo
The Ex-Employee List (EEL)Case Studies5 Core Areas of ExpertiseContact Us

Back

Direct Purchaser - Protecting Buyers' Rights

Direct Purchaser - Protecting Buyers' Rights
Direct Purchaser

August 22, 2024

Direct purchaser lawsuits involve buyers who have been harmed by anticompetitive practices, such as price-fixing or monopolistic behavior. These lawsuits are designed to protect consumers and businesses from being overcharged due to unlawful actions by manufacturers, wholesalers, or suppliers.

In direct purchaser cases, the plaintiffs are typically businesses or consumers who purchased goods or services directly from the defendant. These cases often involve allegations of price-fixing, where competitors conspire to set artificially high prices, or monopolistic practices that harm competition and inflate prices.

To succeed in a direct purchaser case, the plaintiffs must demonstrate that they were harmed by the defendant’s anticompetitive behavior. This often involves showing that prices were higher than they would have been in a competitive market and that the plaintiffs were directly affected by the price increase.

Antitrust laws, such as the Sherman Act and the Clayton Act, are designed to promote competition and prevent unfair practices in the marketplace. These laws prohibit price-fixing, monopolies, and other actions that harm consumers by limiting competition and driving up prices.

Victims of anticompetitive practices may be entitled to compensation for the financial harm they suffered. This can include reimbursement for overcharges, lost profits, and other economic damages. In some cases, plaintiffs may also seek treble damages, which allow them to recover three times the amount of their actual losses.

"Paul and his team delivered exactly what they said they would: a list of impacted fact witnesses and their addresses relevant to our case within a given state, and they did so within our budget." - John W. Barrett, ESQ.

Stratejic Relationships, led by Paul Littrell, Jr., supports direct purchaser cases by helping attorneys identify key witnesses and potential plaintiffs who were harmed by the defendant’s actions. Paul’s 18 years of experience in uncovering relevant information has strengthened numerous legal cases, ensuring that businesses and consumers can seek justice for the financial harm they have suffered.

Direct purchaser cases require a deep understanding of antitrust laws and economic principles. Working with an experienced attorney and leveraging resources from Stratejic Relationships can help plaintiffs succeed in holding companies accountable for their unlawful practices.

Direct purchaser lawsuits play a crucial role in protecting consumers and businesses from the harmful effects of anticompetitive practices. With the support of skilled attorneys and resources like those provided by Stratejic Relationships, plaintiffs can pursue justice and recover compensation for the financial harm they have suffered.


Stay informed with us

Sign up to receive insights from Stratejic Relationships and learn more about new case studies, articles, and more.

What our clients are saying
Penn Law LLC

Paul is a fact witness magnet on his way to becoming a magnate in the niche he's expertly crafted. Not only do he and his team execute a proven method of bringing influential witnesses to bear in complex litigation, helpful fact witnesses just naturally gravitate toward them. People skills incorporated within the Witness|Mining™ process provide a seamless and time-saving transition which helps me develop relationships with fact witnesses with the potential to positively impact cases.

Darren W. Penn, ESQ.
Darren W. Penn, ESQ.

Penn Law LLC

Working with Stratejic Relationships recently has been a very positive experience. Consummate professionals, Paul and his team breathed new life into the investigation of a 10 year old personal injury case by identifying a substantial number of potential fact witnesses who may impact my ability to prevail against a corporate Defendant. They were insightful, prompt, and worked within my budget. Stratejic exceeded my expectations and is an organization with whom I continue to work.

Robert N. Edwards, ESQ.
Robert N. Edwards, ESQ.

The Law Office of Robert N. Edwards

New, Taylor & Associates

Conferring with the Whistleblower provided to me by Stratejic just prior to an important series of depositions provided me with invaluable insights into how my Defendant secretly conducted their business. Twenty minutes into my questions, and the first deponent had shredded the Defense, facilitating settlement. This is a service I will continue to use.

Stephen P. New, ESQ.
Stephen P. New, ESQ.

New, Taylor & Associates

Lipsky Lowe LLP

Stratejic has represented a significant return on my investment. Paul and his team saved me a considerable amount of time filing a class action by providing me with the names and addresses of a number of former, harmed employees of my Defendant. When you need a Class Representative, this is a time-efficient, economical, and ethical path to signing one, and a service I will continue to use.

Douglas B. Lipsky, ESQ.
Douglas B. Lipsky, ESQ.

Lipsky Lowe LLP

Beasley Allen Law Firm

Paul and his team have demonstrated a real proficiency for identifying and acquiring Insider Fact Witnesses who have the potential for bolstering claims, and in my own practice their unique solutions have represented a positive return on my investment.

Michael J. Crow, ESQ.
Michael J. Crow, ESQ.

Beasley Allen Law Firm

Richardson Thomas

Paul is an absolute lightning rod when it comes to investigations which produce fact witnesses who possess relevant information about, and interest in, my firm’s cases. His breadth of associations throughout the country is quite impressive, and he has the uncanny ability to help us forge impactful and beneficial relationships.

Terry E. Richardson, Jr., ESQ.
Terry E. Richardson, Jr., ESQ.

Richardson Thomas

Bailey Glasser, LLP

Paul and his team delivered exactly what they said they would: a list of impacted fact witnesses and their addresses relevant to our case within a given state, and they did so within our budget.

John W. Barrett, ESQ.
John W. Barrett, ESQ.

Bailey Glasser, LLP